Septic Shock: Different Patients, Different Vasopressors
Dr Richard G. Wunderink presents a patient case and holds panel discussion on guiding treatment by perfusion markers.

GIAPREZA in septic shock
GIAPREZA was studied in ATHOS-3, an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 321 patients with vasodilatory (distributive) shock who remained hypotensive despite fluid and traditional vasopressor therapy.1,4
Slide table to view more
Treatment arms1 GIAPREZA (n=163) plus traditional vasopressors* Placebo (n=158) plus traditional vasopressors* | Primary endpoint1 An increase in MAP at hour 3 of at least 10 mmHg, or a MAP response of ≥75 mmHg, without an increase in baseline vasopressor dosing. |
Secondary endpoints1 - Mean change in cardiovascular SOFA score at hour 48 - Mean change in total SOFA score at hour 48 | |
Select additional endpoint1 All-cause mortality through day 28. |
Traditional vasopressors included norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin.4
Slide table to view more
| Select baseline patient characteristics (N=321)1 | GIAPREZA + traditional vasopressors (n=163) | Placebo + traditional vasopressors (n=158) |
|---|---|---|
| Median MAP, mmHg (IQR) | 66.3 (63.7-69.0) | 66.3 (63.0-68.3) |
| Median APACHE II score (IQR) | 27 (22-33) | 29 (22-34) |
| Cause of shock, sepsis (%) | 127 (77.9%) | 132 (83.5%) |
| Median vasopressor dose (NED), mcg/kg/min (IQR) | 0.33 (0.23-0.56) | 0.34 (0.23-0.56) |
| Vasopressin use during 6 hours before randomization (%) | 113 (69.3%) | 111 (70.3%) |
*Doses of GIAPREZA or placebo were titrated to a target MAP of ≥75 mmHg during the first 3 hours of treatment while doses of other vasopressors were maintained. From hour 3 to hour 48, GIAPREZA or placebo was titrated to maintain a MAP between 65 and 70 mmHg while reducing doses of other vasopressors.4
Slide table to view more

48% of patients who achieved target MAP reached it within the first 30 minutes of treatment at doses ≤5 ng/kg/min5
The effect on MAP was sustained for at least the first 3 hours of treatment4
Slide table to view more
Patients with a history of ACEi and ARB favored GIAPREZA over placebo but interpretation should consider the small sample sizes (9% and 7%, respectively).4
Note: The figure above presents effects in select subgroups, all of which are baseline characteristics. The 95% confidence limits that are shown do not take into account the number of comparisons made and may not reflect the effect of a particular factor after adjustment for all other factors. Apparent homogeneity or heterogeneity among groups should not be overinterpreted.4
Dr Richard G. Wunderink presents a patient case and holds panel discussion on guiding treatment by perfusion markers.
Slide table to view more
A meta-analysis found no difference in mortality rates between angiotensin II and norepinephrine (46.2% vs 54.2%; RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.06])
-2021 SSC Guidelines7,*
Not statistically significant. Mortality through day 28 was an exploratory endpoint in ATHOS-3. The study was not powered to detect a difference in mortality.1
*The SSC released updated global guidelines in October 2021 for clinicians caring for adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.7
There was a higher incidence of arterial and venous thrombotic and thromboembolic events in patients who received GIAPREZA compared to placebo-treated patients in the ATHOS-3 study (13% vs 5%).4
In an exploratory post hoc analysis of ATHOS-3, early use of GIAPREZA plus traditional vasopressors was associated with improved survival vs placebo plus traditional vasopressors.8
Slide table to view more


For complete Safety Information of GIAPREZA, .
*Early use was defined as initiation of study treatment at a norepinephrine-equivalent vasopressor dose ≤0.25 mcg/kg/min.8
†Delayed use was defined as initiation at a dose >0.25 mcg/kg/min.8
Dr Samir S. Awad presents a patient case and holds panel discussion on vasopressor escalation strategy.
Slide table to view more
In an exploratory post hoc analysis of ATHOS-3, a shock-disrupted RAAS pathway was confirmed as a key contributor to low MAP. The analysis uncovered abnormally high renin levels and ANG I/II ratios, suggesting RAAS dysfunction, which correlated with a much higher risk of mortality.10
Slide table to view more
| GIAPREZA effectively reduced renin and ANG I levels for better outcomes10: | GIAPREZA + traditional vasopressors | Placebo + traditional vasopressors |
|---|---|---|
| Median reduction in serum renin levels, % | 54.3 | 14.1 |
| Median reduction in serum ANG I levels, % | 39.7 | 7.0 |
| 28-day mortality, % [median (IQR)]† | 51 (39-65) | 70 (59-80) |
| Ventilator liberation by day 7 (alive and ventilator-free), % [median (IQR)]† | 28 (18-43) | 14 (8-25) |
| RRT liberation by day 7 (alive and RRT free), % [median (IQR)]† | 43 (25-66) | 12 (5-27) |
| ICU discharge by day 28, % [median (IQR)]† | 44 (32-58) | 22 (14-33) |
*The upper limit of normal was defined as 58.78 pg/mL; the median renin level was 172.7 pg/mL.10
†Values represent outcomes in patients who had renin concentrations above the study population median.10
Slide table to view more
| GIAPREZA + traditional vasopressors (n=163) | Placebo + traditional vasopressors (n=158) | |
|---|---|---|
| AEs of any grade, % (n) | 87.1% (142) | 91.8% (145) |
| AEs leading to discontinuation, % (n) | 14.1% (23) | 21.5% (34) |
| Any serious AEs with frequency ≥1% in either study group, % (n) | 60.7% (99) | 67.1% (106) |
Adverse reactions occurring in ≥4% of patients treated with GIAPREZA and ≥1.5% more often than in placebo‑treated patients included thromboembolic events, including arterial and venous thrombosis events (12.9% vs 5.1%), deep vein thrombosis (4.3% vs 0.0%), thrombocytopenia (9.8% vs 7.0%), tachycardia (8.6% vs 5.7%), fungal infection (6.1% vs 1.3%), delirium (5.5% vs 0.6%), acidosis (5.5% vs 0.6%), hyperglycemia (4.3% vs 2.5%), and peripheral ischemia (4.3% vs 2.5%).4
Use concurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis.4
Fewer GIAPREZA-treated
patients experienced AEs and
SAEs vs placebo1
Fewer GIAPREZA-treated patients discontinued treatment vs
placebo due to AEs1
Slide table to view more
*Instrumental ADL refers to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, managing money, and other such activities.13
†Self-care ADL refers to bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, and taking medications without being bedridden.13
ACE=angiotensin-converting enzyme; ACEi=ACE inhibitor; ADL=activities of daily living; ANG=angiotensin; ARB=angiotensin II receptor blocker; APACHE 2=Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; ATHOS-3=Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock; CI=confidence interval; ICU=intensive care unit; IQR=interquartile range; MAP=mean arterial pressure; NE=norepinephrine; NED=NE-equivalent dose; RAAS=renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; RRT=renal replacement therapy; SOFA=Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SSC=Surviving Sepsis Campaign.
GIAPREZA® (angiotensin II) increases blood pressure in adults with septic or other distributive shock.
The safety of GIAPREZA was evaluated in 321 adults with septic or other distributive shock in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, ATHOS-3. There was a higher incidence of arterial and venous thrombotic and thromboembolic events in patients who received GIAPREZA compared to placebo-treated patients in the ATHOS-3 study (13% vs. 5%). The major imbalance was in deep venous thromboses. Use concurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis.
The most common adverse reactions reported in greater than 10% of GIAPREZA-treated patients were thromboembolic events. Adverse reactions occurring in ≥4% of patients treated with GIAPREZA and ≥1.5% more often than placebo-treated patients in the ATHOS-3 study were thromboembolic events (including deep vein thrombosis), thrombocytopenia, tachycardia, fungal infection, delirium, acidosis, hyperglycemia, and peripheral ischemia.
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may increase response to GIAPREZA. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may reduce response to GIAPREZA.
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, please contact:
Before administering, please see the Full Prescribing Information for GIAPREZA.